Product Code Database
A tree nut allergy is a hypersensitivity to dietary substances from tree nuts and edible tree , causing an overreaction of the immune system, which may lead to severe physical symptoms. Tree nuts include , , , , hazelnut, , , , , and .Many seeds are commonly referred to as "nuts" even though botanists use the term more restrictively to refer to those that come from indehiscent fruits. See the article about nuts for more information.
Management is by avoiding eating the causal nuts or foods that contain them among their ingredients, and a prompt treatment if there is an accidental ingestion. Total avoidance is complicated because the declaration of the presence of trace amounts of allergens in foods is not mandatory in every country.
Tree nut allergies are distinct from peanut allergy, as are legumes, whereas a tree nut is a hard-shelled nut.
Potentially life-threatening, the anaphylactic onset of an allergic reaction is characterized by respiratory distress, as indicated by wheezing, breathing difficulty, cyanosis, and circulatory impairment that can include a weak pulse, pale skin, and fainting. This can occur when IgE antibodies are released and areas of the body not in direct contact with the food allergen show severe symptoms. Untreated, the overall response can lead to vasodilation, which can be a low blood pressure situation called anaphylactic shock.
Consumption of raw nuts usually causes a more severe reaction than roasted nuts or food-grade nut oils, as processing can reduce the integrity of the allergic proteins.
Storage proteins include the prolamin superfamily (associated with 2S albumins) and the cupin superfamily consisting of legumin-group proteins (the 11S globulin family) and (the 7S globulins). Additional tree nut proteins, which may be called pan-allergens, include lipid transfer proteins, (involved in nut structure), pathogenesis-related proteins, and Pro-hevein, which resemble proteins in pollens and seeds that cause IgE-mediated allergic reactivity in susceptible people.
Since a tree nut allergy can be life-threatening, people who suspect they are having allergic reactions to any kind of tree nut should be tested by an allergist immediately. Tree nut allergies can be genetic and passed down. Skin-prick (scratch) tests and blood tests may be used to determine if an allergy is present by measuring the presence of immunoglobulin E (IgE), an antibody that responds to allergens and triggers the release of chemicals which cause the symptoms.
If the test results are inconclusive an oral food challenge may be used as a final determining factor. This test consists of feeding the patient tiny amounts of the food that they believe is causing their allergic reactions. This is done under the direct supervision of the allergist. Oral food challenges are only used when a full patient history is taken and when the probability of passing the test is high.
People with tree nut allergy are seldom allergic to just one type of nut,
Someone allergic to walnuts or pecans may not have an allergy to cashews or pistachios, because the two groups are only distantly related and do not necessarily share related allergenic proteins.
Tree nut allergy tends to last throughout life, with less than 10% of people outgrowing their tree nut allergy into adulthood. Between 25% and 40% of people allergic to peanuts have allergy to at least one tree nut. Children with tree nut allergies may also develop allergic rhinitis, asthma or atopic dermatitis later in life.
The prevalence of individual tree nut allergies exists substantially by location: hazelnut is the most common tree nut allergy in Europe, with walnut and cashew being most common in the United States, and Brazil nut, almond, and walnut as the most common in the UK.
In January 2025, the FDA issued guidance reducing the number of tree nuts that require food allergen labeling under FALCPA. Under this guidance, coconut, Kola nut, beech nut, butternut, chestnut, chinquapin, Ginkgo biloba, Hickory, palm nut, Canarium ovatum, and shea nut no longer require a "Contains: tree nuts" statement. However, almond, black walnut, Brazil nut, California walnut, cashew, hazelnut, heartnut (Japanese walnut), Macadamia, pecan, pine nut, pistachio, and English and Persian walnut must still be labeled by FALCPA standards.
FALCPA applies to packaged foods regulated by the FDA, which does not include poultry, most meats, certain egg products, and most alcoholic beverages. However, some meat, poultry, and egg processed products may contain allergenic ingredients. These products are regulated by the Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS), which requires that any ingredient be declared in the labeling only by its common or usual name. Neither the identification of the source of a specific ingredient in a parenthetical statement nor the use of statements to alert for the presence of specific ingredients, like "Contains: milk", are mandatory according to FSIS. FALCPA also does not apply to food prepared in restaurants. The EU Food Information for Consumers Regulation 1169/2011 – requires food businesses to provide allergy information on food sold unpackaged, for example, in catering outlets, deli counters, bakeries and sandwich bars.
Labeling regulations have been modified to provide for mandatory labeling of ingredients plus voluntary labeling, termed precautionary allergen labeling (PAL), also known as “may contain” statements, for possible, inadvertent, trace amount, cross-contamination during production. PAL labeling can be confusing to consumers, especially as there can be many variations on the wording of the warning. PAL is regulated only in Switzerland, Japan, Argentina, and South Africa. Argentina decided to prohibit precautionary allergen labeling in 2010, and instead puts the onus on the manufacturer to control the manufacturing process and label only those allergenic ingredients known to be in the products. South Africa does not permit the use of PAL, except when manufacturers demonstrate the potential presence of allergen due to cross-contamination through a documented risk assessment and despite adherence to Good Manufacturing Practice. In Australia and New Zealand there is a recommendation that PAL be replaced by guidance from VITAL 2.0 (Vital Incidental Trace Allergen Labeling). A review identified "the eliciting dose for an allergic reaction in 1% of the population" as ED01. This threshold reference dose for foods (such as cow's milk, egg, peanut, and other proteins) will provide food manufacturers with guidance for developing precautionary labeling and give consumers a better idea of what might be accidentally in a food product beyond "may contain." VITAL 2.0 was developed by the Allergen Bureau, a food industry sponsored, non-government organization. The VITAL Program Allergen Bureau, Australia and New Zealand. The European Union has initiated a process to create labeling regulations for unintentional contamination, but is not expected to publish such before 2024.
In Brazil, since April 2016, the declaration of the possibility of cross-contamination is mandatory when the product does not intentionally add any allergenic food or its derivatives, but the Good Manufacturing Practices and allergen control measures adopted are not sufficient to prevent the presence of accidental trace amounts. These allergens include wheat, rye, barley, oats and their hybrids, crustaceans, eggs, fish, peanuts, soybean, milk of all species of mammalians, , , cashew, , macadamia, , pecan, pistachio, , and .
Causes
Tree nut seed storage proteins are the responsible for severe tree nut allergic reactions. Tree nut allergies are caused by an irregular immune system reaction to two kinds of nut protein – those for storage and metabolism – which bind to immunoglobulin E (IgE) antibody, triggering an immune defense and reaction symptoms that may be mild or as severe as anaphylaxis.
Diagnosis
An allergy test or food challenge may be performed at an allergy clinic to determine the exact allergens involved and to guide a safe treatment or management plan. Healthcare providers analyze how the body reacts to allergens in the safety of a regulated setting.
Prevention
Prevention involves an exclusion Dieting and vigilant avoidance of foods that may be contaminated with tree nuts, nut particles, or oils extracted from nuts. In the United States, the federal Food Allergen Labeling and Consumer Protection Act (FALCPA) requires that any packaged food product that contains tree nuts as an ingredient must list the specific tree nut on the label.National Institutes of Health, NIAID Allergy Statistics. Foods that almost always contain tree nuts include pesto, marzipan, Nutella, baklava, pralines, nougat, gianduja, and turrón. Other common foods that may contain tree nuts include cereals, crackers, cookies, baked goods, candy, chocolates, energy/granola bars, flavored coffee, frozen desserts, marinades, barbecue sauces, and some cold cuts, such as mortadella. Tree nut oils (especially shea nut) are also sometimes used in lotions and soaps. Asian and African restaurants, ice cream parlors, and bakeries are considered high-risk for people with tree nut allergy due to the common use of nuts and the possibility of cross contamination.
Cross-reactivity
People with clinically confirmed tree nut allergy to one type of tree nut may have cross-reactivity to other tree nut species and to peanuts, which are not nuts but rather part of the legume family. The cause is similarity in protein structures. Identifiable allergenic proteins are grouped into families: cupins, prolamins, profilins, and others. Tree nuts have proteins in these families, as do peanuts and other legumes. Reviews of human trials report that for a confirmed tree nut allergy, up to one-third of people will react to more than one type of tree nut. The cross reactivity among almond, walnut, pecan, hazelnut, and Brazil nut is stronger than the cross reactivity of these toward cashew or pistachio.
(2025). 9781466512689, CRC Press. ISBN 9781466512689 and are therefore usually advised to avoid all tree nuts, even though an individual may not be allergic to the nuts of all species of trees.
Prevalence
Tree nut allergy is an understudied area of food allergy research, having few rigorous studies involving long-term follow-up. Its prevalence varies according to age, country, and how the specific allergy is defined, with prevalence occurring worldwide in a range of 0.5% to about 4% of the population.
Treatment
Strict dietary avoidance of the causal nut(s) remains the mainstay of treatment for nut-allergic individuals. Treatment for accidental ingestion of tree nut products by allergic individuals varies depending on the sensitivity of the person. An antihistamine such as diphenhydramine may be prescribed. Antihistamines are usually used in treating mild allergic reactions. Sometimes prednisone will be prescribed to prevent a possible late-phase Type I hypersensitivity reaction. Severe allergic reactions (anaphalaxis) may require treatment with an epinephrine pen, which is an injection device designed to be used by a non-healthcare professional when emergency treatment is warranted.
Regulation
Whether food allergy prevalence is increasing or not, food allergy awareness has increased, with impacts on the quality of life for children, their parents, and their immediate caregivers. In the United States, the Food Allergen Labeling and Consumer Protection Act enacted August 2004, effective January 1, 2006, causes people to be reminded of allergy problems every time they handle a food package, and restaurants have added allergen warnings to menus. The Culinary Institute of America, a premier school for chef training, has courses in allergen-free cooking and a separate teaching kitchen. Culinary Institute of America Allergen-free oasis comes to the CIA (2017) School systems have protocols about what foods can be brought into the school. Despite all these precautions, people with serious allergies are aware that accidental exposure can easily occur at other peoples' houses, at school or in restaurants.
Regulation of labeling
In response to the risk that certain foods pose to those with food allergies, some countries have responded by instituting labeling laws that require food products to inform consumers if their products contain major allergens or byproducts of major allergens among the ingredients intentionally added to foods. "Food allergen labelling and information requirements under the EU Food Information for Consumers Regulation No. 1169/2011: Technical Guidance" (April 2015). Nevertheless, there are no labeling laws to mandatorily declare the presence of trace amounts in the final product as a consequence of cross-contamination, except in Brazil.
Ingredients intentionally added
FALCPA requires companies to disclose on the label whether a packaged food product contains any of these eight major food allergens, added intentionally: cow's milk, peanuts, eggs, shellfish, fish, tree nuts, soy, and wheat. This list originated in 1999 from the World Health Organisation Codex Alimentarius Commission. To meet FALCPA labeling requirements, if an ingredient is derived from one of the required-label allergens, then it must either have its "food sourced name" in parentheses, for example "Casein (milk)," or as an alternative, there must be a statement separate but adjacent to the ingredients list: "Contains milk" (and any other of the allergens with mandatory labeling). The European Union requires listing for those eight major allergens plus molluscs, celery, mustard, lupin, sesame, and sulfites.
Trace amounts as a result of cross-contamination
The value of allergen labeling other than for intentional ingredients is controversial. This concerns labeling for ingredients present unintentionally as a consequence of cross-contact or cross-contamination at any point along the food chain (during raw material transportation, storage or handling, due to shared equipment for processing and packaging, etc.). Experts in this field propose that if allergen labeling is to be useful to consumers, and healthcare professionals who advise and treat those consumers, ideally there should be agreement on which foods require labeling, threshold quantities below which labeling may be of no purpose, and validation of allergen detection methods to test and potentially recall foods that were deliberately or inadvertently contaminated. (2025). 9783318023404 ISBN 9783318023404
Society and culture
Food fear has a significant impact on the quality of life. For children with allergies, quality of life is also affected by actions of their peers. There is an increased occurrence of bullying, which can include threats or acts of deliberately being touched with foods they need to avoid, also having their allergen-free food deliberately contaminated.
Research
Immunotherapy treatments are being developed for tree nut allergy, including oral immunotherapy, sublingual immunotherapy, and epicutaneous immunotherapy.
See also
Notes
External links
|
|
